TDS on commissions to nonresident agents: no deduction required where services are rendered and paid entirely outside India.

Nonresident agents engaged solely to procure export orders and paid commission for services performed and remunerated outside India do not create a business operation in India; therefore their commission income is not deemed to accrue or arise in India, and is not taxable under the territorial nexus principle. Applying precedents that distinguish selling agents acting abroad and services completed overseas, the decision concludes that such payments do not constitute fees for technical services and that the provisions governing source taxation and withholding do not apply; consequence: no obligation to deduct tax at source on those commission payments.

---

---

Issues:
1) Interpretation of Sec. 195 and Sec. 40 (1) (ii) regarding payments made to non-residents.
2) Application of Sec. 9 (i) (vii) and explanation to Sec. 9 (2) in the context of technical services provided by agents.
3) Reliance on precedent and distinction in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Faizan Shoes Pvt. Ltd.

Issue 1:
The appellant contested the order of the Tribunal, arguing that payments to non-residents attract Sec. 195 and Sec. 40 (1) (ii). The Assessing Officer disallowed the expenditure claimed by the assessee for commission payments to foreign agents due to non-deduction of TDS under Sec. 195. The CIT (Appeals) allowed the appeal, stating that the commission paid did not constitute income in the hands of non-resident agents and thus did not fall under Sec. 195. The High Court upheld this view, emphasizing that the commission was paid abroad for services provided outside India, and therefore, the income did not accrue in India, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Issue 2:
Regarding the application of Sec. 9 (i) (vii) and the explanation to Sec. 9 (2), the High Court analyzed the nature of services provided by the non-resident agent. It was concluded that the commission paid for procuring export orders did not qualify as "fees for technical services." The Court highlighted that the services were related to export commitments and did not involve technical services for running the business in India. The Court also referred to relevant judicial precedents and the substitution of the Explanation to Sec. 9 (2) by the Finance Act, 2010, to support its decision that the commission payment did not fall under taxable categories specified in the Act.

Issue 3:
The Tribunal relied on the decision in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Faizan Shoes Pvt. Ltd., which the appellant contested, arguing that the facts were distinguishable. However, the High Court found that the facts in both cases were similar, and the principles established in the Faizan Shoes case were applicable to the present case. The Court further cited the decision in GE India Technology Centre (P.) Ltd.'s case to support the conclusion that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source for services provided outside India. Ultimately, the High Court confirmed the Tribunal's decision, stating that no substantial question of law arose for consideration, and dismissed the appeal.

---