Assessment, Reopening Valid, Capital Gain, Evidence Admitted, Appeal Dismissed

The delay in filing the Cross Objection was condoned due to the genuine reason of the Chartered Accountant's demise. The assessment included goodwill transfer value, resulting in short term capital gain. The reopening of assessment was deemed valid, with notices under section 142(1)(i) considered invalid. Shares in the successor company were allocated based on capital balances, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Additional evidence admission was upheld, and the assessment's maintainability was affirmed, ultimately leading to the dismissal of both the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's Cross Objection by the ITAT MUMBAI.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Condonation of delay in filing Cross Objection (C.O.)
2. Assessment of total income including goodwill transfer value
3. Validity of reopening assessment
4. Allocation of shares in successor company based on capital balances
5. Admission of additional evidence in contravention of Rule 46A
6. Maintainability of assessment in law

Issue 1: Condonation of delay in filing Cross Objection (C.O.)
The C.O. was delayed by 236 days due to the demise of the Chartered Accountant handling the firm's affairs. The reason for delay was deemed genuine and sufficient for condonation. The appeal and C.O. were proceeded with after condonation.

Issue 2: Assessment of total income including goodwill transfer value
The assessment was framed under section 147 r/w s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, bringing the transfer value of goodwill to tax. The condition of section 47(xiii) was not satisfied, leading to short term capital gain on the transfer of goodwill. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed by the CIT(A) on merits.

Issue 3: Validity of reopening assessment
The A.O.'s action in issuing notice u/s.148 was deemed valid as the return of income was not filed by the due date. The notices u/s.142(1)(i) were considered invalid as they were issued after the time limit. The A.O. was not bound to frame the assessment u/s.143(3) as claimed by the assessee.

Issue 4: Allocation of shares in successor company based on capital balances
The shares in the successor company were issued to the erstwhile partners based on their capital balances as on the date of conversion, satisfying the condition of section 47(xiii). The actual allotment prevailed over the conversion deed's specified ratio, leading to dismissal of the Revenue's appeal on merits.

Issue 5: Admission of additional evidence in contravention of Rule 46A
The Revenue's objection regarding admission of additional evidence was dismissed as the ld. CIT(A) found the shares were allocated based on capital balances as on the conversion date. The actual allotment was considered final, and the objection was on merits, leading to dismissal of relevant grounds in the Revenue's appeal.

Issue 6: Maintainability of assessment in law
As the Revenue's appeal was dismissed on merits, the assessee's C.O. raising a legal issue on maintainability of assessment was rendered infructuous. Both the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's C.O. were ultimately dismissed.

This detailed analysis covers the various issues involved in the legal judgment delivered by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT MUMBAI.

---