Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether consideration received for granting user rights in the software OPUS constituted royalty under Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12 of the India-Germany tax treaty.
Analysis: The consideration was found to be for a right to use a copyrighted article, not for any transfer or use of copyright itself. The copyright in the software remained with the original owner, and no rights falling within section 14 of the Copyright Act were shown to have been vested in the Indian users. Following the earlier coordinate bench decisions in the assessee's own case and the approved distinction between a copyrighted article and copyright, the amount could not be treated as royalty. The Tribunal also noted that the software formed an inseparable part of the supply arrangement and did not have independent existence for royalty characterization.
Conclusion: The receipts from granting user rights in OPUS were not taxable as royalty and the addition made on that basis was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Payment for a right to use a copyrighted article, without transfer of any copyright rights, is not royalty under section 9(1)(vi) or the treaty royalty clause.