Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported non-alloy steel slabs were prime quality and entitled to concessional duty under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., and whether the duty demand, confiscation and penalties could be sustained.
Analysis: The goods were initially tested by NML, but a later retest was carried out pursuant to the High Court's directions by MSME. The MSME report, read with the relevant standards, recorded that the slabs were within the prescribed limits and concluded that they were of prime chemistry and met the requirements of prime quality non-alloy steel slabs. The adjudicating authority had ignored material portions of that report, including the remarks showing compliance with the prescribed limits, and had also relied on an unofficial translation of overseas material that was not duly certified and did not discredit the invoice or establish that the goods were non-prime. The Tribunal also noted that the Department had accepted the same MSME report in respect of other consignments.
Conclusion: The MSME report was accepted, the goods were held to be prime quality, and the denial of concessional duty was unsustainable. The duty demand, confiscation, redemption fine and penalties were set aside.