Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was required to make a partial pre-deposit and, upon such deposit, whether recovery of the balance demand was to be waived and stayed pending disposal of the appeal.
Analysis: The dispute arose in an appeal concerning service tax demand under the category of Business Auxiliary Service. The applicant relied on an exemption notification and on an earlier High Court order in a comparable matter. The Tribunal noted the factual distinction that, unlike the cited case where part of the tax had already been paid, no amount had been deposited in the present matter. Taking into account the High Court's observations in the relied-upon decision, the Tribunal found it appropriate to require a limited pre-deposit while protecting the appellant against recovery of the remaining dues during the pendency of the appeal.
Conclusion: The applicant was directed to deposit Rs. 5,00,000 within eight weeks, and on such deposit the balance demand of tax, interest, and penalty was waived and recovery stayed till disposal of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: In a stay application, the extent of pre-deposit may be fixed on the basis of the facts of the case and comparable precedent, with conditional waiver and stay granted for the balance demand upon compliance.