TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal grants stay and waives pre-deposit for appellant in property transfer dispute</h1> <h3>M/s CR-18G-BSCPL-JV, Hyderabad Versus Commissioner of Central Excise And Service Tax, Hyderabad-I</h3> M/s CR-18G-BSCPL-JV, Hyderabad Versus Commissioner of Central Excise And Service Tax, Hyderabad-I - TMI Issues:Service tax demand on works contract service provided to the Government of Andhra Pradesh.Analysis:The appeal was filed against an adjudication order confirming a service tax demand of Rs. 17,46,14,485/- on the appellant for providing 'Works Contract Service' to the Government of Andhra Pradesh under three agreements. The appellant argued that the activities did not fall within the definition of 'works contract service' as per Section 65(105)(zzzza) of the Finance Act, 1994, citing the decision of the Supreme Court in State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors Vs. Larsen & Tourbo Ltd. & Ors. The Supreme Court clarified that in a construction works contract, the property used in construction passes from the builder to the owner of the land when goods or materials are incorporated in the building, even without privity of contract between the contractee and sub-contractor.The appellant, as the principal contractor, had entered into agreements with the Government of Andhra Pradesh for the works contract and then entered into 'Back to Back' agreements with sub-contractors for execution. The total works were executed under these agreements. The adjudicating authority confirmed the service tax demand, considering the works as a 'works contract', which was not disputed by the appellant. However, the appellant argued that the property in goods was transferred to the State Government by the sub-contractors during the execution of works contracts, based on the principle of accretion of property in goods.The Tribunal found a strong prima facie case in favor of the appellant, considering the Supreme Court's decision and the transfer of property in goods by the sub-contractors to the State Government. As a result, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit in full and granted a stay on all further proceedings pending the disposal of the appeal.
TaxTMI 