Tribunal Upholds Commissioner's Order for Excise Recovery with Interest

The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's order, confirming the recovery of Rs. 8,71,12,812/- along with interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeal was dismissed, and the provisions of Section 124 of the Finance Act, 2005, were deemed inapplicable to the appellant's case, as they had reversed the credit before the enactment of the Finance Act, 2005.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Utilization of AED (GSI) credit for payment of Basic Excise Duty (BED) and Special Excise Duty (SED).
2. Retrospective amendment of Rule 3(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 by Section 88 of the Finance Act, 2004.
3. Interest liability on the wrong utilization of AED (GSI) credit.
4. Applicability of Section 124 of the Finance Act, 2005 to the interest liability.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Utilization of AED (GSI) Credit:
The appellant, a tyre manufacturer, utilized AED (GSI) credit amounting to Rs. 8,71,12,812/- accrued before 01/04/2000 for payment of BED and SED on tyres. This utilization was initially permissible under the amended Rule 3(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, effective from 01/03/03. However, Section 88 of the Finance Act, 2004, retrospectively amended Rule 3(6) to disallow the use of AED (GSI) credit accrued before 01/04/2000 for such payments.

2. Retrospective Amendment by Section 88 of the Finance Act, 2004:
Section 88 of the Finance Act, 2004, retrospectively amended Rule 3(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, specifying that AED (GSI) credit accrued before 01/04/2000 could not be used for payment of BED and SED. Sub-Section (4) of Section 88 provided for the recovery of such credit along with interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

3. Interest Liability on Wrong Utilization:
The appellant reversed the wrongly utilized AED (GSI) credit in December 2004. The dispute centered around whether interest should be charged under Section 11AB or in terms of Clause (V) of Section 88(4) of the Finance Act, 2004, as introduced by Section 124 of the Finance Act, 2005. The appellant argued that interest should be charged only from 10/09/04, the date the Finance Act, 2004, received presidential assent, and at a rate of 13% per annum as specified in Clause (V).

4. Applicability of Section 124 of the Finance Act, 2005:
Section 124 of the Finance Act, 2005, added sub-Sections (5) and (6) to Section 88, providing a new mode of recovery of the AED (GSI) credit in 36 installments starting from July 2005, with interest at 13% per annum. The appellant contended that since they had reversed the credit before the enactment of the Finance Act, 2005, these provisions should apply. However, the Tribunal held that these provisions were not retrospective and did not apply to cases where the credit was reversed before the enactment. Thus, interest liability was governed by sub-Section (4) of Section 88 of the Finance Act, 2004, and interest under Section 11AB was applicable from the first day of the month succeeding the month of wrong utilization until the credit was reversed.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's order, confirming the recovery of Rs. 8,71,12,812/- along with interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeal was dismissed, and the provisions of Section 124 of the Finance Act, 2005, were deemed inapplicable to the appellant's case, as they had reversed the credit before the enactment of the Finance Act, 2005.

---