Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the assessment made in pursuance thereof were valid when addressed to a partnership firm that had ceased to exist after conversion into a company under Chapter IX of the Companies Act, 1956.
Analysis: The firm had been converted into a company with effect from 2 March 2006, and the notice under Section 148 was issued later in the name of the erstwhile firm. Once the conversion took effect, the partnership firm ceased to exist in law and the successor company became the assessable entity. A notice issued to a non-existent person cannot sustain proceedings, and participation in the proceedings does not cure that defect. The defect is not a mere procedural irregularity within the scope of Section 292B where the notice itself is issued to a dead or non-existent entity.
Conclusion: The notice under Section 148 and the assessment made pursuant to it were void and liable to be quashed, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessment proceedings failed at the threshold because they were initiated against an entity that had ceased to exist, leaving the Revenue free to proceed, if permissible in law, only against the successor company.
Ratio Decidendi: A notice or assessment issued in the name of a non-existent entity is void, and such a defect is not cured by participation or by Section 292B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.