Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of duty, penalty and interest on job-work clearances was sustainable when the assessee had declared value on the basis of the principal manufacturer's cost data, paid differential duty and interest before the show-cause notice, and the adjudicating authority adopted a comparable price method not proposed in the notice.
Analysis: The declared assessable value had been communicated from time to time on the basis of instructions and cost certificates received from the principal manufacturer, and the variation in value was marginal. The differential duty and interest had already been paid suo motu much before issuance of the show-cause notice. The notice did not allege any contumacious conduct, active suppression, concealment, or deliberate disregard of law. The adjudicating authority nevertheless confirmed the demand by shifting to a comparable-value basis, which was not the foundation of the notice and therefore travelled beyond it.
Conclusion: The demand, penalty and interest were not sustainable. The valuation adopted by the assessee could not be disturbed on the basis of a ground not alleged in the show-cause notice, and the impugned orders were liable to be set aside in favour of the assessee.