TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Formulates Questions of Law on Refund Calculation under Cenvat Credit Rules</h1> <h3>Commissioner Service Tax Versus Quintiles Technologies Pvt. Ltd.</h3> Commissioner Service Tax Versus Quintiles Technologies Pvt. Ltd. - 2015 (40) S.T.R. 237 (Guj.) Issues:1. Application of Rule 5(1)(D) of C.C.R. 2004 prior to 17.3.20122. Verification of foreign exchange receipts for Technical Testing and Analysis service3. Refund on Credit Notes without service provision or foreign exchange receiptsAnalysis:1. The primary issue in this case revolves around the application of Rule 5(1)(D) of C.C.R. 2004 prior to 17.3.2012. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, leading to the formulation of substantial questions of law by the Revenue. The Tribunal's finding emphasized the calculation of refund as per the prescribed formula under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal's decision relied on the definition of 'Export turnover of services' and 'Total turnover' to determine the admissibility of the refund. The appellant contended that all unutilized service tax credit pertaining to exported services should be refundable under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, irrespective of the presence of exempted services in the domestic tariff area. The Tribunal's decision was supported by a similar view taken by CESTAT Mumbai in a related case, strengthening the Assessee's position.2. The second issue concerns the verification of foreign exchange receipts for Technical Testing and Analysis services to determine the eligibility for a refund. The appellant argued that for Cenvat Credit, it was essential to establish that foreign exchange was earned concerning payments for such services. However, the Court rejected this contention, asserting that as a 100% Export Unit, all expenses related to technical services would be part of the turnover. The Court emphasized that expenses for technical services cannot be separately connected when calculating the total turnover for exported services. The Court concluded that the appellant's argument lacked merit, highlighting the interconnected nature of the questions raised by the Revenue.3. The final issue addresses the refund on Credit Notes issued by the Assessee without providing services or receiving payments in foreign exchange. The Tribunal's decision, supported by previous judgments, emphasized that the presence of exempted services in the domestic tariff area does not impact the admissibility of refunds under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Court found no substantial questions of law that warranted interference with the Tribunal's order, ultimately dismissing all appeals on the grounds of meritlessness. The judgment underscores the consistent application of the existing provisions without necessitating any changes based on circulars or notifications, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.
TaxTMI 