Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an SEZ unit was entitled to refund of service tax paid on input services even where the services were wholly consumed within the SEZ.
Analysis: The refund claim arose under Notification No. 9/2009 dated 03.05.2009 as amended by Notification No. 15/2009-ST dated 20.05.2009. The earlier rejection was based on the view that refund was available only where the services were not wholly consumed within the SEZ. The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions, including the assessee's own case, and held that where service tax has already been paid by the service provider, the SEZ unit remains eligible for refund even if the services are wholly consumed within the SEZ.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and the refund claim was held allowable, subject to the amount not pressed.