Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (2) TMI 452 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Dismisses Appeals Below Rs. 4 Lakh Limit, Emphasizes Need to Reduce Litigation The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeals as they fell below the prescribed monetary limit of Rs. 4 lakhs, as per CBDT Instruction No. 5/2014. Citing ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Tribunal Dismisses Appeals Below Rs. 4 Lakh Limit, Emphasizes Need to Reduce Litigation

                            The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeals as they fell below the prescribed monetary limit of Rs. 4 lakhs, as per CBDT Instruction No. 5/2014. Citing judicial precedents, the Tribunal applied the instruction retrospectively to pending cases, emphasizing the need to reduce litigation. The appeals were deemed not maintainable, highlighting the importance of enforcing monetary limits to achieve the intended reduction in pending cases.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Applicability of CBDT Instruction No. 5/2014 regarding monetary limits for filing appeals.
                            2. Retrospective versus prospective application of CBDT instructions.
                            3. Judicial precedents on the applicability of monetary limits to pending cases.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Applicability of CBDT Instruction No. 5/2014 regarding monetary limits for filing appeals:
                            The central issue in these appeals is whether the appeals by the revenue, which have a tax effect below the prescribed limit as per CBDT Instruction No. 5/2014, are maintainable. The instruction, issued on 10.07.2014, sets a monetary limit of Rs. 4 lakhs for filing appeals before the ITAT. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee argued that these appeals should be dismissed as they fall below this threshold. The Ld. CIT-DR contended that the instruction should only apply to appeals filed on or after 10.07.2014, not to those filed before this date.

                            2. Retrospective versus prospective application of CBDT instructions:
                            The Tribunal considered the argument about whether the instruction should be applied retrospectively or prospectively. The Ld. CIT-DR argued for a prospective application, citing para-11 of the instruction, which states that it applies to appeals filed on or after 10.07.2014. However, the Tribunal referenced several judicial precedents which support the retrospective application of such instructions to pending cases.

                            3. Judicial precedents on the applicability of monetary limits to pending cases:
                            The Tribunal cited multiple cases to support the retrospective application of the instruction:
                            - CIT Vs M/s. P. S. Jain & Co. (Delhi High Court): The court noted the increasing burden on the Department and the need to reduce litigation, ruling that the Board's circular on monetary limits should apply to old references as well.
                            - CIT v. Sureshchandra Durgaprasad Khatod (HUF) (Gujarat High Court): The court held that Instruction No. 3/2011, which had a similar clause about prospective application, should apply to pending cases. The court emphasized reducing litigation with minimal tax effect.
                            - Commissioner of Income Tax v. Smt. Vijaya V. Kavekar (Bombay High Court): The court interpreted the instruction to apply to all pending cases, dismissing appeals with tax effects below the revised limits.
                            - Commissioner of Income Tax V/s Delhi Race Club Ltd. (Delhi High Court): The court applied the instruction to pending cases, aligning with the objective of reducing litigation.

                            The Tribunal concluded that the recent instruction (No. 5/2014) should apply to pending appeals as well, given its identical nature to previous instructions and the consistent judicial interpretation supporting such application.

                            Conclusion:
                            In light of the above judicial precedents and the main objective of reducing pending litigation with minimal tax effect, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeals in limine. The appeals were deemed not maintainable as they fell below the prescribed monetary limit of Rs. 4 lakhs, as per CBDT Instruction No. 5/2014. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of applying these instructions to pending cases to achieve the intended reduction in litigation.

                            Order:
                            The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed. The order was pronounced in open court on 04.02.2015.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found