Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of Special Additional Duty of Customs could be denied on the ground that VAT had not been paid on the date of filing the refund application, when such VAT was paid within the prescribed period and other substantive conditions for refund were satisfied.
Analysis: Refund of SAD under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus dated 14/09/2007 is governed by the condition that the imported goods must be sold in the domestic market on payment of sales tax or VAT, supporting documents must evidence payment of SAD and sales tax, and the claim must be filed within one year from payment of SAD. The appellant had paid SAD, effected the relevant sale, and discharged the VAT liability within the one-year period. The objection that VAT was unpaid on the date of filing of the refund claim was treated as a mere prematurity issue, not a failure of substantive eligibility. Denial of refund on that technical ground was therefore held unsustainable.
Conclusion: Refund could not be rejected merely because VAT had not been paid on the date of filing, where the payment was made within the statutory period and the substantive conditions were met.