Tribunal waives penalty for Service Tax non-payment citing voluntary compliance

The Tribunal waived the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act for failure to pay Service Tax on renting immovable property, citing the appellant's compliance with the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme and payment of taxes and interest before the scheme's introduction. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits.

---

---

Issues:
1. Penalty imposition under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 for failure to pay Service Tax on renting of immovable property.
2. Invocation of Section 80 for waiving the penalty based on reasonable cause.
3. Eligibility for waiver under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES).

Analysis:
1. The appellant appealed against the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 for not paying Service Tax on renting out premises to a company. The levy was challenged in court, and the matter was pending in the Hon'ble Supreme Court due to conflicting decisions. The appellant paid the Service Tax later, after the specified date under Section 80(2), leading to the imposition of the penalty.

2. The appellant's counsel argued for waiving the penalty under Section 80, citing precedents like The Agricultural Produce Market Committee case and the Motor World case, emphasizing the concept of "reasonable cause" as explained by the High Court. The appellant also sought relief under the VCES scheme, referring to the Vinayaka Securities case. The AR reiterated the Commissioner's findings, highlighting the condition under Section 80(2) for waiving the penalty.

3. The Tribunal considered the conflicting court decisions regarding the levy of Service Tax on renting of immovable property and the conditional stay granted by the Supreme Court. The appellant failed to meet the conditions set by the Supreme Court, leading to the conclusion that the waiver of penalty under Section 80 could not be extended. However, the Tribunal examined the case under the VCES scheme, where the tax and interest had already been paid before the scheme's introduction. Referring to a circular and the Vinayaka Securities judgment, the Tribunal decided to grant a lenient view and waived the penalty under Section 76.

In conclusion, the penalty under Section 76 was waived, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential benefit.

---