Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the authorization to reopen the trade tax assessment and the consequential reassessment notice were valid when the only basis was that the assessee used ink for printing books under a publishing agreement, and whether such material showed a works contract or other tangible material giving rise to a reason to believe that turnover had escaped assessment.
Analysis: Reopening under section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act requires a bona fide reason to believe, supported by tangible and relevant material having a live nexus with escapement of assessment. A mere reference to purchase of ink, without more, does not establish that the assessee was executing a works contract. The agreement showed publication and sale of books for royalty, with supply at discounted rates to the Government, but it did not disclose the essential ingredients of a works contract. The authority did not demonstrate application of mind to the contract terms and proceeded on a presumption rather than on relevant material.
Conclusion: The reopening was not supported by tangible material or a valid reason to believe, and the authorization and consequential notice were unsustainable.