Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the capital gains arising from the agreement with the developer could be brought to tax in assessment year 1999-2000, and whether the Revenue could depart from the treatment accepted in the cases of similarly placed assessees.
Analysis: The assessee's case was that possession was not handed over in 1999 and that consideration accrued and was offered to tax only over later years when entitlement certificates were issued by the developer. The record also showed that in other similarly placed cases the Department had accepted taxation of the same receipts over the subsequent years and had not consistently proceeded to tax them in assessment year 1999-2000. The Revenue did not controvert these factual assertions. In these circumstances, the settled principle requiring the Revenue to maintain consistency and uniformity in the treatment of similarly placed assessees was applied, and the departure sought in the present case was held unjustified.
Conclusion: The addition made in assessment year 1999-2000 was not sustainable and was directed to be deleted. The appeals were allowed.