Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale consideration from the transfer of the property could be excluded from capital gains computation under section 48(1) on the ground that it was utilised to discharge bank dues of the connected company and firm.
Analysis: The property sold was a capital asset and the sale consideration was first received in the assessees' personal bank account, where it was also placed in fixed deposits and interest was earned. The material on record did not establish a direct nexus between the sale proceeds and the later one-time settlement with the bank. The settlement came after the sale, and the amount claimed to have been used for repayment originated from unsecured loans in the books of the company and firm, which had itself been disbelieved in assessment. On these facts, payment towards discharge of another entity's debt could not be treated as an allowable deduction in computing capital gains. The authorities relied on by the assessee did not override the binding Supreme Court view that discharge of mortgage debt is not deductible as cost or expenditure under section 48.
Conclusion: The claim for deduction under section 48(1) was rejected and the addition of long-term capital gains was sustained.