Pre-notice payment of service tax does not, by itself, erase penalty liability when statutory conditions for levy are satisfied.

Prior payment of service tax before issuance of the show-cause notice did not, by itself, extinguish penalty liability under the penal provisions. The Karnataka HC noted that the assessee had paid the tax belatedly, but the dispute remained confined to penalties; the claim of bona fide mistake was rejected on the facts, and no legal exoneration was established. The principle applied was that payment of the tax amount, whether made before or after notice, does not remove statutory penalty exposure where the conditions for levy are otherwise satisfied. The challenge to the penalty therefore failed, and the impugned order was left undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether payment of service tax before issuance of the show-cause notice absolved the assessee from penalty under the relevant penal provisions.

Analysis: The assessee had belatedly paid the service tax, but the dispute survived only in relation to the penalties. The explanation of bona fide mistake was rejected on facts, and the prior payment of tax by itself was held not to wipe out the penal liability. Reliance was placed on the principle that payment of the tax amount, whether before or after notice, does not by itself affect penalty where the statutory conditions for levy are otherwise satisfied.

Conclusion: Prior payment of service tax before the show-cause notice did not exonerate the assessee from penalty.

Final Conclusion: The challenge to the penalty failed, and the impugned order was left undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Pre-notice payment of tax does not, by itself, negate statutory penalty liability when the facts do not establish a bona fide mistake or other legal exoneration.

---