Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether phosphate and potassium content of NPK 10:26:26 was entitled to exemption from trade tax in view of the departmental circular and government orders.
Analysis: The revision turned on the effect of the departmental circular dated 11.3.2013, read with the earlier government communications, which stated that in NPK 10:26:26 the phosphate and potassium components were exempt from trade tax and tax was leviable only on the nitrogen component at 6.5% per metric ton. The Court held that such a circular issued by the taxing authority was binding on the department, and in light of the earlier Supreme Court and Division Bench authorities on exemption and non-discriminatory treatment of similar fertilizer commodities, the assessee could not be denied the benefit. The Court also held that there was no need to remand the matter to the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The phosphate and potassium content of NPK 10:26:26 was held exempt from trade tax, and the revisionist was held entitled to the exemption.