TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Confiscation of Gold Items Upheld After Lengthy Legal Battle</h1> <h3>COMMR. OF C. EX., NAGPUR Versus RAMRATAN SHRIVALLABH CHANDAK (DEAD)</h3> COMMR. OF C. EX., NAGPUR Versus RAMRATAN SHRIVALLABH CHANDAK (DEAD) - 2014 (310) E.L.T. 438 (Bom.) Issues:1. Confiscation of primary gold under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968.2. Principles of natural justice in confiscation proceedings.3. Appeal process and remand orders.4. Effect of criminal court findings on confiscation orders.5. Compliance with orders after a prolonged period.Issue 1: Confiscation of primary gold under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968:The case involved a search operation leading to the discovery of primary gold in various forms like gold foils, slabs, and rods. The authorities seized the gold and initiated proceedings under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968. The appellant contested the possession of the gold, leading to a series of confiscation orders and appeals.Issue 2: Principles of natural justice in confiscation proceedings:The appellant challenged the initial confiscation order citing violation of principles of natural justice. The Appellate Authority set aside the order for this reason, highlighting the importance of due process in such proceedings.Issue 3: Appeal process and remand orders:After multiple rounds of appeals and remands, the case reached the Tribunal, where the confiscation of certain gold items was confirmed. The penalty amount was reduced, but the confiscation was upheld, leading to further legal challenges.Issue 4: Effect of criminal court findings on confiscation orders:The Criminal Court's findings played a crucial role in determining possession of the primary gold. While the appellant was held responsible for some gold items, the possession of others was not established. The Tribunal considered the criminal court's judgment in its decision-making process.Issue 5: Compliance with orders after a prolonged period:The case had been pending for almost 40 years, highlighting the need for timely compliance with legal orders. The High Court directed the Revenue Authorities to adhere to the Tribunal's decisions within three months, emphasizing the importance of timely execution of legal directives.This detailed analysis covers the various legal aspects and proceedings involved in the judgment, including the search operation, confiscation orders, appeal processes, the role of criminal court findings, and the importance of timely compliance with legal directives.
TaxTMI 