Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether surcharge levied under the Karnataka Agricultural Income-tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 1980 could be sustained in the assessment for assessment year 1980-81 even though the assessment order was passed after the Ordinance had lapsed.
Analysis: The Ordinance was in force for a period that fell within assessment year 1980-81 and had inserted a surcharge provision in the Schedule to the principal Act. The mere fact that the assessment order was made after the Ordinance ceased to operate did not eliminate the liability already attracted for the relevant assessment period. An Ordinance, though temporary in duration under Article 213 of the Constitution of India, continues to govern matters arising out of the period during which it was operative, and assessments relating to that period must be made in accordance with it.
Conclusion: The surcharge was validly levied, and the challenge to the recovery notice failed.