Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether assessments completed on compounded basis under Section 7 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act could be reopened on the basis of revised assessments for prior years, and whether rectification of compounding orders was barred by the limitation under the statute.
Analysis: The compounding scheme under Section 7 operates on a prescribed formula and the assessee's liability is determined by choosing the higher of the two computed figures. The reference to earlier years in the formula is only to the turnover tax payable as conceded in the return or accounts or actually paid, and not to assessed tax. Since assessed tax may be altered in later proceedings, it is not a relevant basis for reopening completed compounding proceedings. The option to pay tax at compounded rates is an alternative to regular assessment, and once accepted, the proceedings can be reopened only to the limited extent of rectifying apparent computational mistakes. Even where rectification is permissible, Section 43 confines that power to the authority that passed the original order and requires exercise within three years from the date of that order.
Conclusion: Reopening of concluded compounding proceedings on the basis of revised prior-year assessments was not sustainable, and rectification beyond the statutory three-year period was barred.