TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the arrangement between the private bus owners and the Corporation constituted renting of cabs within the service tax definition after 1 June 2007; (ii) whether the extended period of limitation was invocable; (iii) whether penalties were sustainable and whether the matter required re-quantification on a cum-tax basis with consideration of abatement.
Issue (i): Whether the arrangement between the private bus owners and the Corporation constituted renting of cabs within the service tax definition after 1 June 2007.
Analysis: The agreement showed that the buses were made available to the Corporation for operation on specified routes for consideration fixed per kilometre, while the Corporation controlled fares, timings, route deployment, and collected the fare proceeds. The owners retained only ownership and remained liable for statutory breaches, but the day-to-day operational control and commercial use of the buses for the Corporation's business were with the Corporation. The post-1 June 2007 definition of cab in the Finance Act, 1994 expanded the taxable entry to include motor vehicles capable of carrying more than 12 passengers, making the service-tax scheme distinct from the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 concept of rent-a-cab. The Tribunal declined to apply the earlier restrictive understanding of rent-a-cab to the amended period.
Conclusion: The activity was taxable as renting of cabs for the period after 1 June 2007.
Issue (ii): Whether the extended period of limitation was invocable.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the arrangement was reflected in the contracts as hiring of buses and that the Board had issued a clarificatory circular in August 2007 indicating taxability of such renting after the amendment. In these circumstances, the Tribunal found no bona fide basis for limiting the demand to the normal period.
Conclusion: The extended period of limitation was upheld.
Issue (iii): Whether penalties were sustainable and whether the matter required re-quantification on a cum-tax basis with consideration of abatement.
Analysis: Given the large number of assessees, the common understanding of the arrangement, and the involvement of a public sector undertaking, the Tribunal held that reasonable cause existed for non-payment and invoked the statutory power to waive penalties. The Tribunal also accepted that the consideration had to be treated as cum-tax and that eligibility for abatement and re-quantification should be examined by the original authority.
Conclusion: Penalties were set aside, and the matter was remanded for re-quantification after treating the receipts as cum-tax and considering abatement.
Final Conclusion: The service tax demand was sustained in principle for the post-amendment period, but the impugned orders were set aside for fresh adjudication on quantification, with penalties deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: For the post-amendment period, an arrangement by which buses are made available to another operator under its operational control and for its commercial use can fall within the taxable concept of renting of cabs, even if the owner retains title and the contract uses the label of hire.
TaxTMI 
