TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal cautions on adding income based on valuation officer's report</h1> <h3>M/s. Shree Rani Sati Construction Versus ACIT-IV, Lucknow</h3> M/s. Shree Rani Sati Construction Versus ACIT-IV, Lucknow - TMI Issues:Validity of reopening of assessment and addition made based on DVO's report under section 142A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Analysis:Issue 1: Validity of Reopening of AssessmentThe assessee filed the return of income after the due date, which was treated as non est. The assessment was framed under section 143(3) of the Act, and the ld. CIT(A) upheld the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of unexplained investment in the property under section 69 of the Act. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to decide the objections raised by the assessee as per norms laid down by the High Court. The Assessing Officer made additions under section 69 of the Act based on the DVO's report. The assessee contended that the reopening of assessment was invalid as the Assessing Officer made a reference to the DVO without waiting for a reply to the notice under section 143(2) of the Act.Issue 2: Addition Based on DVO's ReportThe Assessing Officer referred the case to the DVO under section 142A of the Act for estimating the cost of investment in the property without rejecting the books of account. The assessee argued that the reference to the DVO was illegal and invalid as the Assessing Officer did not follow the proper procedure. The Assessing Officer formed a belief that income had escaped assessment based on information received during the assessment proceedings of another individual. The Tribunal found the reference to the DVO to be invalid and unsustainable in the eyes of the law, deleting the addition made on account of unexplained investment in the property.In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the additions made based on the DVO's report were not sustainable. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following proper procedures and legal requirements before making references to valuation officers and making additions under section 69 of the Act.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
