Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether converting syrup into fountain soft drink through carbon dioxide and a fountain machine amounts to manufacture under Section 2(e-1) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, and whether the resulting soft drink is a taxable different commodity.
Analysis: The definition of manufacture under Section 2(e-1) is wide and includes producing, making, altering, processing, treating or adapting goods. On the facts, the syrup was subjected to processing and converted into consumable soft drink through a fountain machine. The controlling principle is that manufacture is not confined to cases where a completely new commercial commodity emerges; processing may amount to manufacture even if commercial identity is not wholly transformed. The Court treated the Tribunal's view as consistent with this statutory width and with the principle that the emergence of a commercially distinct product is not the only test under this provision.
Conclusion: The conversion of syrup into fountain soft drink amounted to manufacture within Section 2(e-1), and the soft drink was rightly taxed as a manufactured commodity.