Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether gold potassium cyanide manufactured in the course of making imitation jewellery was an intermediate product arising during the course of manufacture of imitation jewellery and was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 84/2003-C.E. (N.T.).
Analysis: The process shown on record established that gold potassium cyanide was produced in the factory as part of the manufacturing chain leading to imitation jewellery. The final product was imitation jewellery, and the intermediate goods were generated and used in that manufacture. On that basis, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the view that the goods emerged during the course of manufacture of imitation jewellery and fell within the scope of the exemption notification issued under Section 11C.
Conclusion: The notification benefit was available to gold potassium cyanide, and the demand was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed and the order dropping the demand was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Intermediate goods generated as part of the manufacturing process of imitation jewellery are covered by the exemption granted for goods arising during the course of such manufacture under the applicable notification.