TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Utilization of Cenvat Credit for GTAs Upheld</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS Versus PANCHMAHAL STEEL LTD.</h3> COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS Versus PANCHMAHAL STEEL LTD. - 2015 (37) S.T.R. 965 (Guj.) , [2016] 87 VST 34 (Guj) Issues:1. Whether CESTAT committed substantial errors of law in allowing the utilization of Cenvat credit for payment of service tax on Goods Transport Agency ServiceRs.2. Whether the decision of Punjab and Haryana High Court regarding payment of service tax from Cenvat credit is legally valid and applicableRs.3. Whether the Notification No. 36/2004 dated 31st December 2004 shifts the liability of service tax payment from the service provider to the service recipient for specified categories of goods transport servicesRs.4. Whether Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 permits the utilization of Cenvat credit for payment of service tax on any output serviceRs.Analysis:1. The case involved a dispute where the assessee utilized Cenvat credit arising from manufacturing activities to pay service tax for Goods Transport Agency (G.T.A.) Service. The Revenue contended that Cenvat credit should not have been used for this purpose. However, the Tribunal upheld the assessee's stand, citing decisions of various High Courts, including Punjab and Haryana High Court, which held that there is no legal restriction on utilizing Cenvat credit for service tax payment on G.T.A. services. The Tribunal's decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 3(4)(e) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, allowing the utilization of Cenvat credit for payment of service tax on any output service.2. The decision of Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of M/s. Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd., which allowed the payment of service tax on G.T.A. service from Cenvat credit, was considered valid and applicable. The High Court relied on Rule 3(4)(e) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, which permits the utilization of Cenvat credit for service tax payment on any output service, including G.T.A. service. This decision was further supported by the Delhi High Court, which emphasized the provisions of Section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, to affirm the legality of utilizing Cenvat credit for service tax payment.3. The Notification No. 36/2004 dated 31st December 2004, issued under Section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, specified categories of goods transport services for which the liability of service tax payment was shifted from the service provider to the service recipient. This notification, in conjunction with the statutory provisions, supported the assessee's right to use Cenvat credit for paying service tax on G.T.A. services.4. Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 allows the utilization of Cenvat credit for payment of service tax on any output service, as specified in clause (e). The combined reading of this rule, along with the decisions of Punjab and Haryana High Court and Delhi High Court, affirmed the legality of utilizing Cenvat credit for service tax payment on G.T.A. services. Consequently, the Tribunal's decision was upheld, and the Tax Appeal was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
