Employee perquisites under tax law: repairs and depreciation excluded, while residence amenities remained within the disallowance rule.

Section 40(c)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was explained as covering only expenditure that directly or indirectly provides a benefit, amenity or perquisite to employees. Repairs to leased or company-owned accommodation were treated as the company's own maintenance obligation and not a perquisite; depreciation on buildings and furniture used for employee accommodation was also outside the provision. Bonus was treated as part of salary, and medical expenses were not perquisites. By contrast, crockery and cutlery supplied at officers' residences were regarded as an amenity, and replacement expenditure on that amenity was subject to disallowance once the statutory ceiling was exceeded.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether expenditure on repairs of buildings taken on lease or owned and used for employees' accommodation was a perquisite within section 40(c)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) whether depreciation on buildings and furniture provided for employees was a perquisite under section 40(c)(iii); (iii) whether bonus and medical expenses paid in relation to employees were perquisites under section 40(c)(iii); and (iv) whether expenditure on replacement of crockery and cutlery at officers' residences was a perquisite or amenity under section 40(c)(iii).

Issue (i): Whether expenditure on repairs of buildings taken on lease or owned and used for employees' accommodation was a perquisite within section 40(c)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The liability to keep leased premises in repair ordinarily rests on the lessee in the absence of a contract to the contrary. The expenditure was incurred by the company to discharge its own obligation in maintaining the premises in good condition, and there was no finding of any unusual or extraordinary expenditure. Section 40(c)(iii) was treated as narrower than the later provision relied on in the contrary authorities.

Conclusion: The expenditure on repairs was not a perquisite under section 40(c)(iii); the question was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether depreciation on buildings and furniture provided for employees was a perquisite under section 40(c)(iii).

Analysis: Depreciation is an allowance referable to an asset of the company. On the language of section 40(c)(iii), the provision was held not to extend to depreciation on company assets used for providing accommodation to employees.

Conclusion: Depreciation on the buildings and furniture was not a perquisite under section 40(c)(iii); the question was answered against the Department and in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iii): Whether bonus and medical expenses paid in relation to employees were perquisites under section 40(c)(iii).

Analysis: The parties accepted that, in light of the earlier decision relied upon, bonus and medical expenses of the kind involved did not fall within perquisites for the purpose of the provision.

Conclusion: Bonus was part of salary and medical expenses were not perquisites; the questions were answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iv): Whether expenditure on replacement of crockery and cutlery at officers' residences was a perquisite or amenity under section 40(c)(iii).

Analysis: Crockery and cutlery provided at the residences constituted an amenity. The amount spent on replacement was expenditure incurred to maintain that amenity, and once the statutory ceiling was exceeded, the expenditure could not be allowed as a deduction.

Conclusion: The replacement expenditure was a perquisite or amenity within section 40(c)(iii); the question was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The reference was disposed of by answering the substantial questions partly in favour of the assessee and partly in favour of the Revenue, with one question declined to be answered.

Ratio Decidendi: Under section 40(c)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, only expenditure that directly or indirectly provides a benefit, amenity, or perquisite to an employee is subject to disallowance, and the provision does not extend to expenditure incurred by the company to discharge its own maintenance obligations or to depreciation on its assets unless the statutory language clearly covers it.

---