Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in the pending appeal.
Analysis: The products in dispute were rice bran fatty acids and rice bran wax, for which exemption under Notification No. 89/95-CE was claimed. The order noted that the department had earlier considered the exemption question, the appellant had sought surrender of registration on that basis, and the department had subsequently communicated that the goods were exempt and that duty ought not to have been collected. In that background, the invocation of the extended period and the allegation of suppression were found, prima facie, unsustainable at this stage. The appellant had already deposited a substantial part of the demand, and the earlier competing views on exemption indicated that the matter required final adjudication.
Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in favour of the appellant.