Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waste and scrap arising in the manufacture of BOPP films is to be treated as a final product or only as a by-product or waste product, and whether credit taken on duty-paid inputs requires reversal or defeats exemption under Notification No. 53/88-C.E.
Analysis: The fact that credit is taken on inputs does not alter their duty-paid character; payment of duty is a matter of fact and the subsequent availment of credit does not render the inputs non-duty paid. The waste and scrap arising in the course of manufacture was not a final product but only a by-product or waste product. On that basis, Rule 57D of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applied, because credit could not be denied or varied merely because part of the inputs was contained in waste, refuse or by-product, even if such waste was exempt or chargeable to nil rate of duty. The exemption under Notification No. 53/88-C.E. therefore remained available.
Conclusion: The waste and scrap qualified as a by-product or waste product, Rule 57D protected the credit, and the benefit of Notification No. 53/88-C.E. could not be denied; the Revenue's challenge failed.