Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2014 (12) TMI 102 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessee's Appeal Partially Allowed: Key Issues Upheld, Exclusion of Incentives Remanded The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, upholding decisions on the first three issues related to unabsorbed depreciation set off, increase ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Assessee's Appeal Partially Allowed: Key Issues Upheld, Exclusion of Incentives Remanded

                            The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, upholding decisions on the first three issues related to unabsorbed depreciation set off, increase in WDV of assets, and categorization of loss on surrender of lease. The fourth issue concerning the exclusion of incentives not accrued from income was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Claim of set off of unabsorbed depreciation from another company.
                            2. Alternate claim to increase WDV of assets acquired by unabsorbed depreciation.
                            3. Claim of loss on surrender of lease.
                            4. Non-exclusion of incentives not accrued from the income offered.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Claim of Set Off of Unabsorbed Depreciation from Another Company:
                            The assessee claimed the set off of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation belonging to M/s. GVK Novopan Industries P. Ltd., under section 72A of the I.T. Act, following a merger and demerger scheme approved by the Hon'ble A.P. High Court. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] rejected this claim, stating that the scheme did not meet the definition of amalgamation as per section 2(1B) of the Act. The Tribunal upheld this decision, noting that M/s. GVK Novopan Industries P. Ltd. continued to exist as a separate entity and had not been amalgamated with the assessee company. Therefore, the provisions of section 72A were not applicable, and the unabsorbed depreciation could not be set off in the assessee's case.

                            2. Alternate Claim to Increase WDV of Assets Acquired by Unabsorbed Depreciation:
                            The assessee alternatively claimed that if the set off of unabsorbed depreciation was not allowed, the Written Down Value (WDV) of the assets should be increased by the amount of unabsorbed depreciation. The CIT(A) did not provide a specific finding on this ground. The Tribunal rejected this claim, stating that the cases relied upon by the assessee pertained to amalgamations, which was not the case here. The assessee had acquired assets and liabilities and issued shares in lieu thereof, so the cost at which the assets were acquired was the cost for depreciation purposes. The Tribunal concluded that the WDV of assets could not be increased by the unabsorbed depreciation of M/s. GVK Novopan Industries P. Ltd., as there was no amalgamation.

                            3. Claim of Loss on Surrender of Lease:
                            The assessee claimed a loss of Rs. 24,89,096 on the surrender of a lease as revenue expenditure. The A.O. treated this as a capital loss, stating that the expenditure was incurred towards setting up a new unit, which is a capital transaction. The CIT(A) upheld this decision. The Tribunal agreed with the lower authorities, stating that the expenditure was for acquiring land for establishing a factory, which would have resulted in acquiring an asset. Therefore, the loss on surrender of the lease was correctly categorized as a capital loss, not a revenue expenditure.

                            4. Non-exclusion of Incentives Not Accrued from the Income Offered:
                            The assessee requested the exclusion of Rs. 91,25,379 (Rs. 34,21,854 as sales tax incentive and Rs. 57,03,525 as electricity consumption incentive) from its income, as these amounts were not realized. The A.O. did not consider this claim, and the CIT(A) dismissed it, stating that the incentives were rightly shown as income on an accrual basis. The Tribunal noted that the issue required fresh examination by the A.O. since the amounts accounted as income were not received. The Tribunal directed the A.O. to examine the entries made in the books of accounts during the year and in later years and allow the deduction accordingly. If the deduction was already allowed in a later year, it should be withdrawn. This issue was restored to the file of the A.O. for fresh adjudication.

                            Conclusion:
                            The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal upholding the decisions of the lower authorities on the first three issues and remanding the fourth issue to the A.O. for fresh examination.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found