Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court allows appeal, sets aside Tribunal order under Section 35F, case restored for hearing</h1> The High Court of Karnataka allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal's order for non-compliance under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The ... Restoration of appeal - Non compliance of pre deposit order - Appellant has deposited the amount of pre-deposit now - Karnataka High Court restored the appeal of the assessee against the decision of Tribunal [2014 (11) TMI 758 - CESTAT BANGALORE] of dismissing the appeal on the ground of non-compliance under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The High Court of Karnataka allowed the appeal against the Tribunal's order for non-compliance under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal's order was set aside, and the case was restored for hearing on merits after the appellant deposited Rs. 3 lakhs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
