Stay rejection vulnerable for non-consideration of later appellate order and CBDT stay guidelines, requiring fresh review.

An order rejecting a stay application may be set aside where it was made before a later appellate tribunal order and the later order was not placed before, or considered by, the deciding authority, as this indicates non-application of mind. The CBDT Instruction No. 1914 dated 02.12.1993 requires the authority, while considering stay of demand, to examine whether the disputed demand concerns issues already decided in the assessee's favour or involves conflicting High Court decisions. On that basis, the stay rejection was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order rejecting the stay application was liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration in view of the later order of the Appellate Tribunal and the guidelines in CBDT Instruction No. 1914 dated 02.12.1993.

Analysis: The stay application had been decided before the order of the Appellate Tribunal was passed, and the impugned order was therefore vulnerable either because the later appellate order had not been placed before the authority or because it had not been taken into account. In either event, the decision suffered from non-application of mind. The relevant CBDT instruction governing stay of demand required the authority to consider whether the demand in dispute related to issues already decided in the assessee's favour or to conflicting High Court decisions.

Conclusion: The order rejecting stay was set aside and the matter was remanded to the authority for fresh consideration of the stay application.

---