Tribunal grants relief to assessee by allowing Form No. 10 in reassessment proceedings

The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to accept Form No. 10 filed during reassessment proceedings and grant the benefit under section 11(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that since the assessment was reopened due to non-furnishing of Form No. 10, the assessee was entitled to file it during reassessment. The Tribunal distinguished previous case law and supported the assessee's position, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee on this issue.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Rejection of Form No. 10 by the Assessing Officer (AO) during reassessment proceedings.
2. Whether Form No. 10 can be filed during reassessment proceedings.
3. Set-off of excess income over expenditure against earlier years' expenditure.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Rejection of Form No. 10 by the AO during reassessment proceedings

The assessee, a society registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, filed its return for the assessment year 2007-08 declaring 'nil' income after claiming exemption under section 11. The return was initially processed under section 143(1) and subsequently scrutinized, leading to an assessment under section 143(3) accepting the returned income. The AO later noticed that the assessee had accumulated Rs. 98,76,511 over the mandatory 15% of gross receipts without filing Form No. 10 as required under section 11(2). Consequently, the AO issued a notice under section 148 for reassessment and rejected the Form No. 10 submitted by the assessee during the reassessment proceedings, citing that it was filed beyond the prescribed period and not before the completion of the original assessment under section 143(3).

Issue 2: Whether Form No. 10 can be filed during reassessment proceedings

The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in CIT Vs. Nagpur Hotels Owners Association, which mandates that the particulars required under Rule 17 in Form No. 10 must be furnished before the completion of the assessment. The CIT(A) also cited the Supreme Court's decision in CIT Vs. Sun Engineering Works, emphasizing that reassessment proceedings under section 147 are for the benefit of the revenue, not the assessee. The assessee argued that as per section 2(8), assessment includes reassessment, and hence, Form No. 10 could be filed during reassessment proceedings. The assessee relied on the Delhi High Court's decision in Association of Corporation and Apex Societies of Handlooms Vs. ADIT, which allowed the filing of Form No. 10 during reassessment proceedings.

The Tribunal considered the submissions and noted that the AO had accepted the assessee's claim of exemption under section 11 in the original assessment without raising the issue of non-filing of Form No. 10. The Tribunal distinguished the facts of the present case from the Nagpur Hotels Owners Association case, where Form No. 10 was submitted after the completion of the assessment. The Tribunal concluded that since the assessment was reopened for assessing escaped income due to non-furnishing of Form No. 10, the assessee was entitled to file Form No. 10 during the reassessment proceedings. The Tribunal also referred to the Delhi High Court's decision, which supported the assessee's contention. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO to accept Form No. 10 and allow the benefit under section 11(2) read with Rule 17.

Issue 3: Set-off of excess income over expenditure against earlier years' expenditure

The assessee raised an alternative contention that the excess income over expenditure in the impugned assessment year should be set off against the expenditure incurred in excess of 85% in earlier years. However, in view of the Tribunal's decision on the second issue, this ground was deemed of mere academic interest and was not adjudicated.

Conclusion:

The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, with the Tribunal directing the AO to accept Form No. 10 filed during the reassessment proceedings and allow the benefit under section 11(2).

Pronounced in the open court on 12th November, 2014.

---