Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods re-imported into India were liable to customs duty where the goods exported earlier had not enjoyed any tax incentive benefit and were shown to be the same goods, without any substantial change, covered by Notification No. 94/96-C.E. dated 16-12-1996.
Analysis: The notification governing re-importation was applied to the undisputed factual position that the goods brought back were the very same goods that had earlier gone out of India. No contrary evidence was shown to establish that the exported goods and re-imported goods were different. The absence of any substantial change in the character of the goods meant that goods originating from an exempted area did not lose that character merely on re-importation.
Conclusion: The re-imported goods were not liable to customs duty, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.