Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount representing deferred sales tax, which was treated as deemed paid under the sales tax deferral scheme and later discharged on payment of its net present value, was chargeable to tax under Section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee had been permitted under the State incentive scheme to retain sales tax collections as a deferred liability and such amount was treated as deemed paid for the purpose of Section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The later scheme permitted premature payment of the deferred liability at its net present value, and on such payment the remaining liability stood extinguished. Section 41(1) applies only where an allowance or deduction has been made and the assessee thereafter obtains a benefit by way of remission or cessation of a trading liability. On the facts, the amount retained under the deferral scheme was not an income or benefit arising from business, and the premature payment did not result in any remission or cessation giving rise to taxable income.
Conclusion: Section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not attracted, and the amount was not liable to tax in the hands of the assessee.