TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal grants appeal, exempts 100% EOU under Notification 23/2003, upholds CENVAT Credit use</h1> <h3>M/s VVF LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BELAPUR</h3> M/s VVF LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BELAPUR - 2015 (315) E.L.T. 303 (Tri. - Mumbai) Issues:- Confirmation of demand with interest and penalty- Recovery of CENVAT Credit with penalties- Eligibility for exemption under Notification 23/2003- Correct utilization of CENVAT CreditConfirmation of demand with interest and penalty:The appellant appealed against the order confirming a demand of Rs. 17,84,45,537/- with interest and equivalent penalty, along with a demand for recovery of CENVAT Credit of Rs. 4,29,58,148/- with interest and penalties under Rule 25/26(2)(ii) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The demands were issued for both extended and normal periods of limitation.Eligibility for exemption under Notification 23/2003:The core issue revolved around whether the appellant was eligible for exemption under Notification 23/2003. The appellant, a 100% EOU, manufactured goods cleared into DTA under concessional rates of duties. The dispute arose regarding the payment of Special Additional Duty under Section 3(5) of the CTA for clearances of finished goods to their own units in DTA on stock transfer. The Revenue contended that the appellant was not eligible for exemption as no sales tax was paid, a condition as per the Notification. The appellant argued that they fulfilled the conditions of the Notification as goods were not exempt from sales tax by the State Government. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the benefit of the Notification was available as the goods sold in DTA were not exempted from sales tax.Correct utilization of CENVAT Credit:Another issue raised was the utilization of CENVAT Credit towards payment of duty leviable on the aggregate of Customs duties under proviso to Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Revenue contended that the CENVAT Credit could only be used towards payment of education cess on excisable goods, not for Customs duties. The Tribunal held that the duty paid by the appellant was Central Excise duty under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, not Customs duties. Therefore, the appellants correctly utilized the CENVAT Credit in respect of cess of excisable goods towards payment of duty/cess leviable under Section 3.Conclusion:The Tribunal set aside the order-in-original, allowing the appeal with consequential relief, based on the correct interpretation of the law and the eligibility of the appellant for the exemption under Notification 23/2003. The judgment highlighted the importance of fulfilling the conditions of notifications and correctly applying CENVAT Credit in accordance with the law.
TaxTMI 