Assessable value under excise: known trade discounts and transport-related expenses outside the factory are not includible.

Trade discount offered to dealers in the form of free duty-paid bottles was deductible from assessable value because it formed part of the known discount policy and was fixed before sale. Advertisement and publicity linked only to painting brand name and logo on delivery vehicles, with no separate publicity campaign shown, was not includible in assessable value. Vehicle and handling staff costs covering drivers, helpers, vehicle maintenance, and loading and unloading outside the factory were transportation-related expenses and were also not includible. On these valuation components, the demand and penalty did not survive and the lower order was set aside.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the discount given to dealers in the form of free duty-paid bottles was deductible as trade discount while determining the assessable value. (ii) Whether the expenses shown as advertisement and publicity were includible in the assessable value. (iii) Whether the vehicle and handling staff cost was includible in the assessable value.

Issue (i): Whether the discount given to dealers in the form of free duty-paid bottles was deductible as trade discount while determining the assessable value.

Analysis: The discount was given under the appellant's known discount policy and was provided to dealers in the form of free duty-paid bottles on purchase of specified quantities. Since the discount was known prior to sale, it answered the requirement for exclusion as trade discount from the assessable value.

Conclusion: The discount was deductible and could not be included in the assessable value.

Issue (ii): Whether the expenses shown as advertisement and publicity were includible in the assessable value.

Analysis: The expenditure was found to relate to painting of the brand name and logo on vehicles used for delivery, and there was no evidence of any separate publicity campaign. On that factual basis, the expenditure was not liable to be treated as an includible element of assessable value.

Conclusion: The advertisement and publicity expenditure was not includible in the assessable value.

Issue (iii): Whether the vehicle and handling staff cost was includible in the assessable value.

Analysis: The record showed that this head covered salaries of drivers and helpers, vehicle maintenance, and loading and unloading outside the factory. These were transportation-related expenses and were not part of the assessable value of the goods.

Conclusion: The vehicle and handling staff cost was not includible in the assessable value.

Final Conclusion: The demand and penalty did not survive on the disputed valuation components and the order of the lower authority was set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: Trade discount known to buyers prior to sale, and transportation-related expenses incurred beyond the factory gate, are not includible in the assessable value of excisable goods.

---