Customs valuation and royalty payments: technical know-how fees were not includible absent a sale-condition nexus.

Rule 10(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules permits addition of royalty or licence fees only where the payment relates to the imported goods and the buyer is required to make it as a condition of sale. The statutory explanation widens coverage to royalty or other payments for a process even if that process occurs after importation, but it does not remove the basic nexus and condition-of-sale requirements. On the stated facts, the royalty was for technical know-how used to manufacture sub-assemblies of brake systems, not for the imported components themselves, so it was not includible in assessable value and the demand was unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether royalty paid for technical know-how was includible in the assessable value of imported goods under Rule 10(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007, and whether the statutory explanation altered the requirement that such payment be a condition of sale.

Analysis: Rule 10(1)(c) permits inclusion only of royalties and licence fees related to the imported goods which the buyer is required to pay as a condition of sale, to the extent not already included in the price actually paid or payable. The explanation extends includibility to royalties or other payments for a process even if the imported goods undergo that process after importation, but it does not dispense with the basic requirement that the payment must be linked to the imported goods and payable as a condition of sale. On the facts, the royalty was payable for technical know-how used in manufacture of sub-assemblies of brake systems and not for the imported components as such.

Conclusion: The royalty and related charges were not includible in the assessable value and the demand was unsustainable.

---