Capital goods eligibility for M.S. tanks under Rule 57Q was upheld for Modvat credit on manufacturing plant use.

M.S. tanks used in the manufacturing process were treated as capital goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q because they formed part of the manufacturing plant and fell within the expression "machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances" in Explanation 1(a). Eligibility had to be determined by the law prevailing when credit was taken, so the later inclusion of M.S. tanks under Notification No. 6/2001-CE(NT) did not govern the earlier period. The Revenue's challenge failed, and the order allowing Modvat credit was affirmed.

---

---

Issues: Whether M.S. tanks used in the manufacturing process were eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: The dispute concerned the proper scope of "capital goods" under Rule 57Q as it stood during the relevant period. The Court accepted the finding that the tanks were used in the manufacturing process and formed part of the manufacturing plant, falling within the expression "machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances" in Explanation 1(a) to Rule 57Q. The subsequent inclusion of M.S. tanks under Notification No. 6/2001-CE(NT) did not control the eligibility for the earlier period because the rule had to be applied on the basis of the law prevailing when the credit was taken.

Conclusion: M.S. tanks were capital goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q, and the Revenue's challenge failed.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was dismissed and the order allowing Modvat credit to the assessee was affirmed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are shown to be used in the factory as part of the manufacturing plant for producing or processing final products, they fall within the scope of capital goods under Rule 57Q as it stood during the relevant period.

---