Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether commission paid to non-resident foreign agents for services rendered outside India attracted deduction of tax at source under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether Circular No. 7 dated 22/10/2009 could override Circular No. 786 dated 07/02/2000 for the relevant assessment year.
Analysis: Section 40(a)(ia) applies where tax deductible under Chapter XVII-B has not been deducted, but the payments in question were commission to non-resident agents operating outside India. The Court noted that such payments were not chargeable to tax in India in the absence of any permanent establishment in India, and that section 195 is attracted only when the sum is chargeable to tax in India. Circular No. 786 dated 07/02/2000 governed the assessment year in question and the later Circular No. 7 dated 22/10/2009 was held not to operate retrospectively so as to alter the position for earlier payments. The objection regarding business expediency was also not found to raise any substantial question warranting interference.
Conclusion: The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was not sustainable and the Revenue's appeal failed.