Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether charter hire charges paid for use of a vessel hired from a UAE resident were chargeable to tax in India as royalty, so as to require deduction of tax at source under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or were covered by the India-UAE DTAA as profits from operation of ships in international traffic.
Analysis: The payment was made under a time charter for a fully operational vessel used for transport of goods between India and Maldives. Though the domestic law definition of royalty in section 9(1)(vi), read with Explanation 2(iva), is wide enough to include consideration for use or right to use industrial, commercial or scientific equipment, the treaty contained a specific provision for shipping. Article 8 of the DTAA provided that profits derived from the operation of ships in international traffic are taxable only in the State of residence, and expressly included charter or rental of ships incidental to such transportation. Since the vessel operated between Tuticorin and Maldives in international traffic, the more beneficial treaty provision prevailed over the domestic charging fiction by virtue of section 90. The charter hire therefore could not be treated as royalty taxable in India, and no obligation to deduct tax at source arose on that payment.
Conclusion: The charter hire payment was not taxable in India as royalty and the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source on that amount.