Tribunal: Water project not Business Support Service. Pre-deposit waived, recovery stayed. Analyze activities for tax.

The Tribunal held that the appellants' activity of owning, operating, and maintaining a water supply project and selling water did not fall under the category of Business Support Service. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit and ordered the stay of recovery of the service tax, interest, and penalty during the appeal, emphasizing the need to analyze activities to determine tax applicability and provide evidence for waiver of pre-deposit in legal proceedings.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether the appellants are liable to pay service tax for providing Business Support Service.
2. Whether the appellants' activity falls under the category of Business Support Service.
3. Whether the appellants made out a case for waiver of pre-deposit.

Analysis:
1. The appellants were alleged to have provided Business Support Service to a corporation under a Build, Own, Operate and Transfer (BOOT) agreement. The demand of service tax was confirmed by the adjudicating authority, invoking the extended period. The appellants contested this allegation, arguing they did not provide any service to the corporation and that their activity did not fall under Business Support Service.

2. The Tribunal examined the agreement between the parties and found that the appellants were responsible for owning, operating, and maintaining a water supply project, selling water to the corporation on agreed terms. The Tribunal concluded that the amounts received by the appellants were for the sale of water and not for providing a service. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the appellants' activity did not fall under the category of Business Support Service, citing relevant case law and interpretation principles.

3. After considering the facts and submissions, the Tribunal found that the appellants had made a good case for waiver of pre-deposit. Consequently, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit and ordered the stay of recovery of the impugned service tax, interest, and penalty during the pendency of the appeal.

This judgment highlights the importance of analyzing the nature of activities to determine the applicability of service tax and the significance of providing supporting evidence to substantiate claims for waiver of pre-deposit during legal proceedings.

---