Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was a primary co-operative bank and therefore outside the scope of deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) by virtue of Section 80P(4).
Analysis: The relevant enquiry was whether the assessee satisfied all the conditions of a primary co-operative bank under the Banking Regulation Act, namely that its principal business was banking, its paid-up share capital and reserves exceeded the statutory minimum, and its bye-laws did not permit admission of another co-operative society as a member. The society was found to accept deposits from members and non-members, which satisfied the banking-business condition and the capital condition was also met. However, the bye-laws and the governing provisions under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act permitted admission of other co-operative societies as members, so the third statutory condition was not fulfilled. Since all three conditions had to be cumulatively satisfied before the society could be treated as a primary co-operative bank, it did not fall within the exclusion in Section 80P(4). A co-operative society engaged in banking or credit facilities to its members therefore continued to remain eligible under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).
Conclusion: The assessee was not a primary co-operative bank and was entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i); the revenue's challenge failed.