1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court overturns Tribunal's decision in CSTA No. 33/2006 on burden of proof for seized cigarettes.</h1> The High Court of Karnataka allowed the appeal in CSTA No. 33/2006, setting aside the Tribunal's order and restoring the original and appellate ... Seizure of cigarettes - Held that:- Goods involved were 99 Intel Premium processors, whereas in the present case, it is 5,76,000 cigarettes which were seized from the possession of the respondents. Certainly those cigars were not meant for personal consumption, but were meant for business and they had foreign markings - Following decision of COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE Versus TV. MOHAMMED [2014 (9) TMI 376 - Karnataka High Court] - Decided in favour of Revenue. The High Court of Karnataka allowed the appeal in CSTA No. 33/2006 regarding burden of proof in a case involving seized cigarettes. The court set aside the Tribunal's order and restored the original and appellate authority's orders. No costs were awarded.