TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court overturns Tribunal's decision in CSTA No. 33/2006 on burden of proof for seized cigarettes.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS Versus B. DAYALAL JAIN</h3> The High Court of Karnataka allowed the appeal in CSTA No. 33/2006, setting aside the Tribunal's order and restoring the original and appellate ... Seizure of cigarettes - Held that:- Goods involved were 99 Intel Premium processors, whereas in the present case, it is 5,76,000 cigarettes which were seized from the possession of the respondents. Certainly those cigars were not meant for personal consumption, but were meant for business and they had foreign markings - Following decision of COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE Versus TV. MOHAMMED [2014 (9) TMI 376 - Karnataka High Court] - Decided in favour of Revenue. The High Court of Karnataka allowed the appeal in CSTA No. 33/2006 regarding burden of proof in a case involving seized cigarettes. The court set aside the Tribunal's order and restored the original and appellate authority's orders. No costs were awarded.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
