Court reinstates redemption fine for illegal possession of US $21,800, emphasizing lack of valid reasons for reduction.

The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal's order that reduced the redemption fine and penalty imposed on an appellant caught with illegal possession of US $21,800. The Court reinstated the Appellate Commissioner's decision, emphasizing the lack of valid reasons for the reduction by the Tribunal and the proper consideration of legal evidence in the initial decision.

---

---

Issues involved:
Appeal against reduction of redemption fine and penalty by Tribunal without proper reasoning.

Analysis:
The case involved an appellant caught with illegal possession of US $21,800, not purchased from authorized dealers, attempting to smuggle out of India. The adjudicating authority imposed confiscation and penalty, upheld by the Appellate Commissioner who reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 6,00,000. The appellant appealed to the Tribunal seeking further reduction, which relied on an irrelevant judgment to reduce the fine to Rs. 2,50,000 and penalty to Rs. 50,000. The High Court found the Tribunal's approach improper, noting the lack of valid reasons for the reduction. The Court emphasized that the Appellate Commissioner's decision was well-considered, based on legal evidence, and not contested by the appellant. Therefore, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's order, and restored the Appellate Commissioner's decision, answering the substantial question in favor of the Revenue and against the appellant.

---