SSI exemption and limitation disputes led to partial pre-deposit relief, with balance recovery stayed pending appeal.

Denial of SSI exemption, disputed Cenvat credit and limitation were the core issues in the appeal. The note states that goods had been cleared under another person's brand name, so SSI exemption was not available for the relevant period, and the limitation plea failed because the brand-name use had been suppressed from the Department over a long period. The demand, after cum-duty benefit, was treated as substantial, while the Cenvat credit and input-use dispute was left for examination at the appeal stage. Full waiver of pre-deposit was declined; a further pre-deposit of Rs. 10,00,000 was directed, and the balance duty, interest and penalty were stayed pending the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to full waiver of pre-deposit in the appeal arising from denial of SSI exemption and dispute regarding Cenvat credit and limitation.

Analysis: The appellant had cleared goods under another person's brand name and had opted for SSI exemption for the relevant period. The demand, after giving cum-duty benefit, was found to be substantial, and the plea of limitation was rejected in view of the long-standing clearance under the brand name of another person and the suppression of the brand-name usage from the Department. The adjudicating record also showed a dispute on the use of inputs in manufacture, and the material placed by the appellant on Cenvat credit and use of inputs was left for examination at the appeal stage.

Conclusion: Full waiver was not granted. The appellant was directed to make a further pre-deposit of Rs. 10,00,000, and on such deposit the balance duty, interest, and penalty stood waived and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal.

---