Appellant ordered to obtain correct surety bond format before President of India. Case adjourned for formalities. The Tribunal directs the appellant to ensure the tenant executes the surety bond in the correct format accepted by the competent authority before the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellant ordered to obtain correct surety bond format before President of India. Case adjourned for formalities.
The Tribunal directs the appellant to ensure the tenant executes the surety bond in the correct format accepted by the competent authority before the President of India through the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner. The case is adjourned for four weeks to complete the surety bond formalities, with the stay petitions scheduled for listing on 30.09.2014 for further proceedings regarding the service tax demand confirmation.
Issues: Service tax demand confirmation, Execution of surety bond, Proper format of surety bond, Stay petition listing.
Service Tax Demand Confirmation: The appeal and stay petition challenge an order confirming a service tax demand of &8377; 4,37,351 against the appellant. The Adjudicating authority has already appropriated a partial payment made by the appellant towards the demand. The appellant's consultant argues that the tenant, involved in a separate challenge against the service tax levy, has executed a surety bond as per a Supreme Court order. However, the surety bond submitted by the tenant is not in the proper format accepted by the competent authority. The Tribunal directs the appellant to ensure the tenant executes the bond in the correct format before the competent authority.
Execution of Surety Bond: The tenant, involved in a separate challenge against the service tax levy, has executed a surety bond for 50% of the service tax demand confirmed. The surety bond submitted by the tenant is on a stamp paper valued at &8377; 100, but it does not comply with the required format accepted by the competent authority. The Tribunal instructs the appellant to inform the tenant to execute the bond in the proper format before the competent authority, ensuring it is signed in the presence of the competent authority and accepted properly.
Proper Format of Surety Bond: The Tribunal notes that the surety bond executed by the tenant is not in the correct format accepted in favor of the President of India through the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner. The bond must be signed in the presence of the competent authority for acceptance. As the current bond does not meet these requirements, the Tribunal directs the appellant to ensure the tenant executes the bond in the proper format before the competent authority, considering the creditworthiness of the surety.
Stay Petition Listing: The appellant's counsel requests four weeks to complete the formalities related to the surety bond. Consequently, the Tribunal directs the stay petitions to be listed on 30.09.2014 for the completion of the surety bond formalities. The case is adjourned until the specified date for further proceedings.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.