Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the allotment of the house property to the mother on dissolution of the partnership or on family adjustment amounted to a deemed gift by the assessee, attracting gift tax.
Analysis: The property was originally held by the mother and the two sons, and the subsequent arrangement was examined either as a family adjustment akin to partition or as an allotment on dissolution of the partnership. In either situation, the person claiming to have gifted the property had only an antecedent share and no transfer of a new title arose. A partition merely transforms joint enjoyment into enjoyment in severalty, and the dissolution of a partnership followed by allotment of assets does not amount to a transfer giving rise to a gift tax liability. The statutory concept of gift under the Gift Tax Act applies only where there is a voluntary transfer without consideration, and that requirement was not satisfied here.
Conclusion: The allotment did not constitute a deemed gift, and the answer is in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by holding that no gift tax liability arose on the facts found, and the remaining questions were treated as unnecessary for separate adjudication.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a family partition or dissolution of partnership merely reallocates assets according to antecedent rights, there is no transfer creating a deemed gift for the purposes of gift tax.