TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal adjusts interest rate on delayed duty payments, upholds penalty under Central Excise Act.</h1> <h3>Amman Woven Sacks Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry </h3> Amman Woven Sacks Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry - TMI Issues:Leviability of interest on delayed payment of duty.Analysis:The appeal concerns the imposition of interest on delayed payment of duty by the appellants for the period July 2004 to October 2004. The department issued a show cause notice demanding interest under Section 11A read with Rule 8 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, along with a penalty. The adjudicating authority confirmed the interest demand and imposed a penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision, leading to the appeal before the Tribunal. The appellant argued that interest should be calculated as per Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, which prescribes a lower rate than Rule 8 (3) of the Central Excise Rules. The appellant relied on various tribunal decisions to support their argument that interest should not exceed the rates specified under Section 11AB.The Revenue, on the other hand, contended that Rule 8 (3) of the Central Excise Rules is independent of Section 11AB and allows for a higher rate of interest. They cited amendments to the rule and relied on judgments from the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court and other tribunal decisions to support their position that interest at 2% per month is applicable on delayed duty payments.After hearing both sides, the Tribunal noted that the issue revolved around the calculation of interest on delayed payments. The Tribunal observed that subsequent to a judgment by the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court, the government amended the rules to align with the original provisions introduced in 2002. The Tribunal also considered the discrepancy in interest rates between Rule 8 (3) and Section 11AB. Referring to previous tribunal decisions, the Tribunal held that interest on delayed payment should not exceed the rates prescribed under Section 11AB. Therefore, the Tribunal modified the order to charge interest at 13% per annum as provided under Section 11AB and upheld the penalty imposed. The appeal was allowed in these terms.In conclusion, the Tribunal clarified the applicable interest rate on delayed duty payments, emphasizing adherence to the rates specified under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act and setting aside the higher rate calculated under Rule 8 (3) of the Central Excise Rules.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
